you're reading...

The Outsider (Le E’tranger) by Albert Camus

The Outsider is written by Albert Camus. Originally named Le E’tranger in French, it is titled as The Outsider in Europe and The Stranger in North America.

Meursault will not pretend. After the death of his mother, everyone is shocked when he shows no sadness. And when he commits a random act of violence in Algiers, society is baffled. Why would this seemingly law-abiding bachelor do such a thing? and why does he show no remorse, even when it could save his life?

His refusal to satisfy the feelings of others only increases his guilt in the eyes of the law. Soon Meursault discovers that he is being tried not simply for his crime, but for his lack for emotion – a reaction that condemns him for being an outsider.

The novel is essentially Camus’ treatise on Absurdism and dualisms, showing the beautiful harmony that the universe maintains through the inevitability of the balancing of extremes. He is fundamentally flawed in the eyes of society by his extreme indifference; and that even in the face of events like love and marriage to Marie or condemning a woman to Raymond’s abuse, all he can say is “I didn’t mind” or “that’s fine by me”….. He does not cry at his mother’s funeral, in fact….. life goes on for Meursault. Because of his indifference, and easy-going personality, ironically neighbours and friends around him like him a lot.

In court Meursault is condemned for these actions and for appearing to disregard his mother’s life. This is another way in which Meursault is different from society; rather than stand on ceremony and ruminate fruitlessly on the meaning of a life that has passed, he chooses to give meaning to his own. In this way Camus uses Meursault as an active existentialist who is trying to find meaning in the universe through the only means he knows. Indifference became a sin. The truth became intolerable. Meursault’s fate is met with tragic end.

Meursault, the main character, isn’t someone that you warm up to. I felt frustrated to the fact that, faced with the major events that requires decision for his life, all he can say is “I don’t mind” and that he didn’t love his girlfriend but wouldn’t mind get married and he display a lack of emotion when his boss assigned him to Paris for work. He explained that his “physical needs always distorted his feelings”. At some point I often wonder if Camus was trying to paint a man with autism condition. Meursault sounds like he got a medical condition.

Instead Camus meant this simple story to be a political parable. In the afterword, he said,

‘In our society any man who doesn’t cry at his mother’s funeral is liable to condemned to death.’ Meursault doesn’t play the game. The answer is simple: he refuses to lie. Lying is not only saying what isn’t true. It is also, in fact especially, saying more than is true and, in the case of the human heart, saying more than one feels. We all do it, every day, to make life simpler. But, contrary to appearances, Meursault doesn’t want to make life simpler. He says what he is, he refuses to hide his feelings and society immediately feels threatened.

What moves me was the moment when Meursault was trying to intervene for his own case during the court trial, he was asked to shut up by his lawyer. Meursault feels “In a way, they seemed to be conducting the case independently of me. Things were happening without me even intervening. My fate was being decided without anyone asking my opinion.

That was the point, when I feel for Meursault and the irony and frustration of not having control of your own fate.

Rating: 3.5/5

If you decide to give Camus a try, try this one. At 119 pages, it’s quick and easy, much easier than trying to plough through his other more intellectual and academic work.

I am reading this for A to Z and the Classics Challenges.

Paperback. Publisher: Penguin Books 2000 (originally published 1942); Length: 119 pages; Setting: 1940’s Algeria. Source: Library Loot. Finished reading at: 8 May 2010. Translated by Joseph Laredo.

About the writer:

Albert Camus ; 7 November 1913–4 January 1960) was a French Algerian author, philosopher, and journalist who was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1957. He was a key philosopher of the 20th-century and his most famous work is the novel L’Étranger (The Stranger, in the context of my post, The Outsider).

In 1949, Camus founded the Group for International Liaisons within the Revolutionary Union Movement, which was a group opposed to some tendencies of the surrealistic movement of André Breton. Camus was the second-youngest recipient of the Nobel Prize for Literature – after Rudyard Kipling – when he became the first African-born writer to receive the award. He is the shortest-lived of any literature laureate to date, having died in an automobile accident just over two years after receiving the award.

He is often cited as a proponent of existentialism, the philosophy that he was associated with during his own lifetime, but Camus himself rejected this particular label. In an interview in 1945, Camus rejected any ideological associations: “No, I am not an existentialist. Sartre and I are always surprised to see our names linked…” Specifically, his views contributed to the rise of the more current philosophy known as absurdism. He wrote in his essay The Rebel that his whole life was devoted to opposing the philosophy of nihilism while still delving deeply into individual freedom.

For more of Albert Camus see Albert Camus.

About JoV

A bookaholic that went out of control.... I eat, sleep and breathe books. Well, lately I do other stuff.


9 thoughts on “The Outsider (Le E’tranger) by Albert Camus

  1. This book has been on my radar for a while but just haven’t got around it. Didn’t realize he is a Nobel laureate. That might’ve just given him some points of priority to climb up my tbr pile!

    Posted by mee | May 14, 2010, 10:53 pm
    • Hi Mee,
      Thanks for commenting minutes after I posted the post. I think this is the only one which I could digest of Camus. His other works was so complex that it requires a better state of mind of me to read it.

      Always great to write a post and see a comment coming in! Good Morning! and good night for me. 🙂

      Posted by JoV | May 14, 2010, 10:57 pm
  2. I’ve heard this book mentioned before but didn’t really know anything about it. I think it sounds interesting even if the main character is hard to relate to and the 119 pages is very appealing! – I might give it a try. Thanks for writing about it.

    Posted by Tracey | May 18, 2010, 5:38 pm
  3. Your review is so much more better than mine! I agree with you – it was an easy read, too easy sometimes so much so that I was scared I was missing something!

    Posted by Soulmuser | July 15, 2012, 8:23 am
    • Soul,
      I don’t mine is better than yours. Soul. Simple review is good too. Simple book that conveys a lot is the best. I hope to read more of those. 🙂 Thanks for dropping by.

      Posted by JoV | July 15, 2012, 12:30 pm


  1. Pingback: Classic Reading Challenge : Wrap-up post « Bibliojunkie - October 29, 2010

  2. Pingback: Camus: A Romance by Elizabeth Hawes « Bibliojunkie - February 20, 2011

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 276 other followers

Ratings Defined

0 = Abandon the book after first chapter

1 = Waste of paper, we will see what the environmentalist say about this!

2 = Skip it, read the book if you have got nothing better to do

2.5 = An average book, easily forgettable.

3 = A good read.

3.5 = A good entertaining read, a page-turner

4 = So glad that I read the book, a book with substance and invaluable for future reference

4.5 = So glad that I read the book, would pester everyone to read it, invaluable, I would want to own it and wouldn't mind a second read (something that I seldom do)

5 = The book is so good that I feel like I am on scale 4 and 4.5, and more, it blew me away and lingers on my head for weeks!

Books Read

JoV's bookshelf: read
Hold Tight
The Fault in Our Stars
The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon
The Thief
Catching Fire
A Tale for the Time Being
Into the Darkest Corner
The Liars' Gospel
Goat Mountain
Strange Weather In Tokyo
Strange Shores
And the Mountains Echoed
Ten White Geese
One Step Too Far
The Innocents
The General: The ordinary man who became one of the bravest prisoners in Guantanamo
White Dog Fell from the Sky
A Virtual Love
The Fall of the Stone City

JoV's favorite books »
Share book reviews and ratings with JoV, and even join a book club on Goodreads.

Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking. - Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

%d bloggers like this: