you're reading...

The Devotion of Suspect X by Keigo Higashino

It’s hard to write a review for this book. Meaning I can’t write the review without spoiling the story for you.

You see this is one of the rare mystery books that tells you who-dunnit-it at the very beginning and then you watch the authority playing a cat and mouse chase to corner the culprit(s) to admit to the crime. I thought I knew it all. Yet, the plot sprang me with big surprises, knocked me off from my own assumptions and gave me double somersaults in my brain and hyperventilating until the very end. So I’m going to go ahead and spoilt it anyway and implore you that even if you think you know what is going to happen in this book, go ahead and read it anyway!

Set in Tokyo, Yasuko Hanaoka and daughter Misato move to another city to avoid ex-husband’s, Togashi, stalking for money. Yasuko works in a bento shop and everyday her neighbour, a maths teacher named Tetsuya Ishigami, dropped by to order the special just to have a glimpse of Yasuko. One night, during a struggle, Togashi was killed by Yasuko and daughter and Ishigami showed up at the doorstep, calmly offers to help dispose of the body.

Soon the body was found in the other side of the river and it was found in the most horrifying condition:

According to Kishitani’s report, the body had been left in a sorry state. It had been stripped of clothes, shoes, even socks. The face had been smashed — like a split melon, the young detective had said, which was more than enough to make Kusanagi queasy. The fingers had been burned, too, completely destroying any fingerprints. The corpse was male. Marks around the neck indicated he had been strangled. There were no other wounds apparent on the rest of the body.

The police also found a new bicycle at the crime scene and the clothing of the dead man was half burnt.

We now know how the crime happens and how the body was found. So what is going to happen when the police come chasing?

The police squad, led by Kishitani and colleague Kusanagi began to question the deceased ex-wife, Yasuka. The police squad combed and traced every possible people that are connected to Yasuka, her ex-employer at the club, her current employer, her suitor Kudo and neighbour Ishigami. Yasuka’s alibi seems to be air-tight. On the night of the murder, she claimed that she went out with her daughter for a movie and then for a Karaoke session and came home at 9:30pm and they have all the evidence to prove the alibi. Through the questioning Kishitani get to know that Ishigami and Yukawa both graduated from Imperial University and may have been in the same class. It turns out that Ishigami and Yukawa were old classmates who have lost contact. Yukawa, in his capacity as a friend, reconnects with Ishigami and begins his own investigation into the murder while the official investigation is in progress.

Every time the police catches up, Ishigami manages to stay one step ahead of the police. After all, Ishigami was a gifted mathematician who gave up a promising career and got stuck in a teaching career with a bunch of students who have the least interest with mathematics. No matter how easy he tries to set his questions, especially questions that led them down one assumption, none of his students could pass his exams. That’s the way Ishigami operates, lead the police into one assumption (a red herring), where he got the trails all covered up and the police would find nothing. It will take a close friend Yukawa who understands Ishigami and Yukawa’s intelligence to be able to crack the case.

Kusanagi was talking about the way you designed the tests you give to your students, taking advantage of the blink spots created by the students’ own assumptions. Like making an algebra problem look like a geometry problem, for instance. It made sense. It’s very effective for tripping up the ones who don’t understand the underlying principles and just try to solve everything by the book. The student sees what they think is a geometry problem, so they attack it from that angle. But they can’t solve it. They get nowhere, and end up just wasting time. Some people might call it unfair, but it’s a very effective way of measuring someone’s true ability. – Yukawa (page 327)

The story is a puzzle embedded in a bigger puzzle. A story that challenges the reader’s blind spot. It’s the sort of mystery novel that once you know the answer, you would like to re-read the novel from the beginning to find out clues within each conversation to detect at what point Yukawa obtain the insights and came to his conclusions. Not only the plotting is superb, the character development was excellent too. I empathise with the pair of mother and daughter and hoping that they won’t get caught. At one point I thought the story was going to take a cynical end that Yasuko is seeing another man and I start to wonder if Ishigami is going to get any creepier? I also like reading about Yukawa’s hypothesis about how the murder is committed.

I feel like all along I am privy to a secret that a few people know, only to find myself proven wrong at the end. None, if I could recall, a novel had done that to me. If I have to compare this (I can’t help but to compare) with Villain by Shuichi Yoshida , I would rate The Devotion of Suspect X plotting as the very best but personally like Villain better.


Paperback. Publisher: Abacus, 2011, originally published in Japanese in 2005; Length: 440 pages; Setting: Contemporary Japan.Source: Reading Battle Library. Finished reading at: 7th March 2012. Translated by Alexander O. Smith with Elye J. Alexander.

Other views:

Jackie@farmlanebooks.co.uk:The Devotion of Suspect X is a perfect thriller. It isn’t particularly deep or meaningful, but it is endlessly entertaining. I can see why it sold 2 million copies inJapan and I hope that word-of-mouth spreads it around the world. Highly recommended.

Kim@Reading Matters: The real success of the novel, however, lies in the impossible-to-guess climax. I found myself completely in awe of the way in which Higashino drew everything together so neatly and still managed to provide an utterly unexpected ending, completely out of left-field. Is it any wonder more than two million copies of this book have been sold in Japan alone: it is a masterpiece of authorial restraint, concept and plotting. More please.

Maxine@Petrona: The prose is flat and the text is written in colloquial American style, so all the characters think in American slang and descriptions are Americanised, ruining a great deal of the atmosphere that would have been provided by use of Japanese words and phrases instead of them being substituted for their American equivalents*. The characters are two-dimensional, with important avenues left unexplored. This is most marked in the case of Yasuko’s young daughter, the character whose role in the story interested me the most, and whose dramatic actions bookend the plot – she is basically ignored. Unfortunately, I found the whole thing rather boring and neither cared about nor was moved by the final revelation — because none of the characters seemed like real, three-dimensional people.

Bernadette@Reactions to Reading: Ultimately I found this book more of a gothic melodrama than anything else and I guess I’m just not romantic enough to have been sucked into its orbit. I’ll acknowledge that it did create an atmosphere of sorts but for me there was no real substance to it and I grew quickly tired of the contrivances of the plot. My personal recommendation for a thoughtful and intriguing work of Japanese crime fiction would be Shuichi Yoshida’s Villain.

About the writer:

Keigo Higashino (東野 圭吾, born February 4, 1958) is a Japanese author chiefly known for his mystery novels.Born in Osaka, he started writing novels while still working as an engineer at Nippon Denso Co. (presently DENSO). He won the Edogawa Rampo Award, which is awarded annually to the finest mystery work, in 1985 for the novel Hōkago (After School) at age 27. Subsequently, he quit his job and started a career as a writer in Tokyo.

In 1999, he won the Mystery Writers of Japan Award for the novel Himitsu (The Secret), which was translated into English by Kerim Yasar and published by Vertical Inc. under the title of Naoko in 2004. In 2006, he won the 134th Naoki Prize for Yōgisha X no Kenshin (The Devotion of Suspect X). His novels had been nominated five times before winning with this novel. The novel also won the 6th Honkaku Mystery Grand Prize. He writes not only mystery novels but also essays and story books for children.


About JoV

A bookaholic that went out of control.... I eat, sleep and breathe books. Well, lately I do other stuff.


28 thoughts on “The Devotion of Suspect X by Keigo Higashino

  1. I’m glad you enjoyed the book even though it wasn’t a favourite of mine – the world would be boring if we all thought the same way eh?

    Posted by bernadetteinoz | March 17, 2012, 9:59 pm
  2. Recommended by both you and Jackie, this book is going straight to the wishlist! It sounds really good.

    I just hope the unexpected ending (you wrote that you were thinking you knew what happened but you were wrong) doesn’t mean that certain information has been withheld from the reader so they could never have guessed the truth. I don’t like that, it feels like cheating. I assume that’s not the case here.

    Thanks for the review. On the basis of it, I’m keen to read the book now (as if I have nothing on the TBR)!

    Posted by Leeswammes | March 18, 2012, 7:45 am
    • Judith,
      It depends how people look at it. I read many mystery books and as the book progresses, clues were scattered and hints were dropped. In this case, how the body is found is the main clue. if a reader doesn’t get it, like me!, doesn’t get it, it’s my inability not to get it, and I’m not here to blame that information has been withheld from me. If I get them all, would it still consider a good mystery book?

      Thanks for being here.

      Posted by JoV | March 18, 2012, 8:47 am
      • Jo, I meant more that it turns out that someone has a secret hobby or job that you as a reader didn’t know about, or that the main investigator has been researching the case “behind the reader’s back” and so suddenly has lots more information than the reader. That;s cheating, in my eyes. But it sounds in this case, that is not at all the matter.

        Posted by Leeswammes | March 18, 2012, 11:15 am
  3. This is one I’ve been thinking about trying – but that cover has sent it plummeting down my list (by a good six months at least!). ‘The Japanese Stieg Larsson’? ‘The Japanese thriller phenomenon’?

    Make that a year 😉

    Posted by Tony | March 18, 2012, 9:13 am
    • Tony,
      I know. How could they pick such a horrible cover?!! Try the hardback? The hardback cover looks better. Yes I was about to say something about the “Japanese Stieg Larsson” comment. Very cliche.

      Posted by JoV | March 18, 2012, 9:35 pm
  4. Nice review. I thought Villain was better than this one, not least because it provided a much better sense of “place” and atmosphere. I would say to Lee that the solution certainly depends on the reader not being told certain information, but then it is that kind of book, where one sees everything filtered through narrow perspectives of individual characters. That is, there is a lot one does not see or is not told. Some of this omittted material is relevant, some is not (eg we are only ever told about one neighbour that the police question after the crime has been committed – didn’t they ask other people?)

    Posted by Maxine | March 18, 2012, 11:15 am
    • Maxine,
      Thanks for the comment. I don’t think this fault is The devotion of suspect X alone. There is definitely some hints without giving away the answer. For instant at the beginning, I wasn’t sure why the scenes of homeless people around the riverside bears any consequences, and why Yukawa insisted on talking to Ishigami at the bridge, and why the clothes are half burnt and not totally burnt, and why new bicycle was picked instead of the the old, leading the police to make the conclusion that the dead body begs to be discovered. Without giving it too much away here, it all came together at the very end.

      Posted by JoV | March 18, 2012, 9:33 pm
  5. I’m pleased that you enjoyed reading this one. I thought the ending was very clever and I haven’t read anything similar either.

    I’m actually quite pleased that you preferred Villian – I haven’t read that one yet, but I look forward to doing so.

    Posted by Jackie Bailey (@farmlanebooks) | March 19, 2012, 11:26 am
  6. i agree with tony bad cover and wonder how many more books going see with the next steig larsson of here and there ,all the best stu

    Posted by winstonsdad | March 19, 2012, 8:12 pm
  7. I’m subscribed to the comments so in the emails I saw people saying how bad the cover was. I had to come back here and check: I think it’s OK. Yes, you have to ignore that silly Stieg Larsson thing – they say that about so many thrillers, it’s totally meaningless. But the cover suggest a thriller and that’s what this is?

    Posted by Leeswammes | March 19, 2012, 9:29 pm
    • Judith,
      LOL thank you for subscribing to the comments Judith! This may get selected for your bad cover competition! 🙂
      I didn’t like the cover but I really want to read the book so I didn’t care that much! Do you think there is going to be a Dutch ‘Stieg Larsson’?

      Posted by JoV | March 19, 2012, 9:40 pm
  8. I’ve been meaning to try this book too – it sounds like the perfect book to curl up with and try to figure out! I like the sound of Villain as well. Another book for the TBR pile..

    Posted by Tracey | March 20, 2012, 8:36 pm
  9. As you probably know by now JoV I love a good murder mystery thriller, and I’m really intrigued by the topsy-turvy structure to this story, think I will have to pop it down on my tbr list.

    Posted by jessicabookworm | March 22, 2012, 12:47 pm
  10. Yes the Stieg Larsson comment was silly, because, as we all know: Stieg Larsson’s writing is terrible.

    Posted by Fred | October 28, 2012, 12:05 pm


  1. Pingback: Library Loot (28 March 2012) | Olduvai Reads - March 28, 2012

  2. Pingback: March 2012 : Wrap-up! « JoV's Book Pyramid - April 10, 2012

  3. Pingback: Library Loot (18 April 2012) « Olduvai Reads - April 18, 2012

  4. Pingback: Book Blogger Appreciation Week Day 3 | Olduvai Reads - February 17, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 276 other subscribers

Ratings Defined

0 = Abandon the book after first chapter

1 = Waste of paper, we will see what the environmentalist say about this!

2 = Skip it, read the book if you have got nothing better to do

2.5 = An average book, easily forgettable.

3 = A good read.

3.5 = A good entertaining read, a page-turner

4 = So glad that I read the book, a book with substance and invaluable for future reference

4.5 = So glad that I read the book, would pester everyone to read it, invaluable, I would want to own it and wouldn't mind a second read (something that I seldom do)

5 = The book is so good that I feel like I am on scale 4 and 4.5, and more, it blew me away and lingers on my head for weeks!

Books Read

JoV's bookshelf: read
Hold Tight
The Fault in Our Stars
The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon
The Thief
Catching Fire
A Tale for the Time Being
Into the Darkest Corner
The Liars' Gospel
Goat Mountain
Strange Weather In Tokyo
Strange Shores
And the Mountains Echoed
Ten White Geese
One Step Too Far
The Innocents
The General: The ordinary man who became one of the bravest prisoners in Guantanamo
White Dog Fell from the Sky
A Virtual Love
The Fall of the Stone City

JoV's favorite books »
Share book reviews and ratings with JoV, and even join a book club on Goodreads.

Reading, after a certain age, diverts the mind too much from its creative pursuits. Any man who reads too much and uses his own brain too little falls into lazy habits of thinking. - Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955)

%d bloggers like this: