Today we begin the Midnight’s Children Read-Along. It is not too late if you want to sign up still.
I have decided to post some general and in-depth discussion questions so that you could keep a look out for various characters and literary prose in the novel and explore how you feel about them (page numbers are guidance only). Some questions we may not be able to talk about it now until we have finished the book but that’s alright, because I haven’t got a clue as much as you are since we are reading this along together!
You may choose to discuss some or all of the questions.
10 STARTING POINTS FOR YOUR DISCUSSION
- Saleem describes himself as ‘handcuffed to history’. What do you think that this means, and do you think that this is true of him?
- The prose of Midnight’s Children has a distinctly filmic quality. Why do you think this is, and what would be the implications of making a film of the novel?
- Unlike many novels, Midnight’s Children is not written using a linear narrative. Why do you think that Rushdie uses this technique, and do you think that it is successful?
- Saleem makes many errors in his narrative – both accidental and purposeful. Why do you think that he does this, and why does he not bother to correct his mistakes?
- What is Padma’s role in the novel?
For the first 100 pages, you might want to explore the following in-depth discussion questions. The page numbers serves as a guidance.
- “What is so precious to need all this writing-shiting?” asks Padma (p. 24). What is the value of it for Saleem, do you think?
- Saleem often appears to be an unreliable narrator, mixing up dates and hazarding details of events he never witnessed. He also draws attention to his own telling of the story: “Like an incompetent puppeteer, I reveal the hands holding the strings…” (p. 65). How much faith do you put in his version of events?
- “To understand just one life, you have to swallow the world … do you wonder, then, that I was a heavy child?” (p. 109). Is it possible, within the limits of a novel, to “understand” a life?
- Saleem’s father says of Wee Willie Winkie, “That’s a cheeky fellow; he goes too far.” The Englishman Methwold disagrees: “The tradition of the fool, you know. Licensed to provoke and tease.” (p. 102). The novel itself provokes and teases the reader a good deal. Did you feel yourself “provoked”? Does the above exchange shed any light on Rushdie’s own plight since The Satanic Verses?
- and my question is.. how much of the novel, do you think, is autobiographical?
Enjoy your first week of Read-along! I’ll see you at Week 1 wrap-up next Friday!
Here’s the participants list again (in order of sign-up):
Bina of “If you can read this”
Jessica of Park Benches and Bookends
Madeleine at Madeleine at books and photos
Sign up now and I’ll add you in!
Wow. I’ve wanted to read this for the longest time – but it’s so big it sort of put me off. I’ll see if I can get my hands on a copy today (library) and join you if I can. I like how you set up the questions before-hand. It gives us something to look out for while we’re reading.
Hello Zee! I’ll put your name in All the same! So happy to have you with us! 😉
Add me, I even bought his latest book but have to read any of his novels yet. This i a good time :).
Great to have you here, will add you in as soon as I get some sleep and open my eyes again the next day! 🙂
My post is up:
http://ifyoucanreadthis.wordpress.com/2010/11/13/read-along-midnights-children-book-1/
Can’t wait to read everyone else’s thoughts, the books is really good, glad you got me to read it 🙂 (oh, and I read book 1 for this week, will probably divide book 2, and then read book 3 for the final post)
Bina, left a comment on the post. Great stuff! Does it come in 3 books? or is it your mental division? 😉 I think the book is great too!
Heh, it does come structured into 3 books with lots of chapters, did not make this up 😀 Aren’t all editions structured like this? I’ve got the 25th anniversary edition.
LOL 😀 Bina, the first thing I woke up this morning is to read the book in a quiet corner. When I arrived at page 142+, I bumped into the division and end of Book 1! Imagine my surprise, I am one reader who avoid reading table of contents, introduction of a novel and just plunge straight into it! This is a classic joke, yes Bina you didn’t make it up! 😉
Hey JoV! I’d love to be a part of this, but I actually checked out the book at the library when I read it and don’t have a copy. However, I’ll try to keep up with what you guys are reading and leave a comment now and then to chime in on the conversation. It’s a great book!
Hi Amy, that’s alright! It is great having you here! 😉
I m starting this evening currently am here and off to work in a bit looking forward to rereading this ,all the best stu
No pressure Stu, I am glad you are with us. 😉
My intro post is up. This is a re-read for me, partly to see if my 1999 self was right to list this book as a personal favorite.
The sad thing is that I don’t remember much of this book at all. Now that I do more reviews, it’s easier to recall things.
Rob, I am glad that you took up the challenge and the time to read this again. It is interesting to find out how you feel about the second time around. I felt I benefit a lot more when I give a good book a second read and I hope if many of us are reading this together, you’ll discover (and I’ll discover) a lot through the discussion that we may have overlooked.
JoV – The book does look really thick!
OK. Baby steps. First 100 pages first … hehehe.
Sigh Wilfrid, stop counting and start reading! Rushdie writes beautifully, you will finish it before you know it! Baby steps and then take a giant leap, don’t take too long! 😉
Jo, I actually borrowed a copy from the library and read first page just to have a taste. But I’m in the middle of other books and don’t feel like starting a new one especially as I’d like to give Midnight’s Children my full attention and concentration. I think it deserves it. So I have to say I stepped down from the challenge for now. But who knows, I might read it soon after you all do. Have fun! 🙂
Awwww….. so sad you are not joining us Mee. Really hope you like the book, one you won’t regret reading it. 😉
can I still join in? I started the book earlier this year and would like to finish it – doing it with others may be just what I need to achieve that! I have already read Book 1 and can post on that while I dig into Book 2.
Hi Colleen, you are more than welcome to join us!! See you this Friday for week 2 wrap-up! 😉
My first post on Midnight’s Children is up-
http://rereadinglives.blogspot.com/2010/11/midnights-children-by-salman-rusdie.html
Thanks Mel. A Brilliant review, will share it this Friday. 😉
I’m on page 62… but I’m dying to contribute.
So far enjoying the decadently confusing prose. Initially, I found the shifting narrative a bit tormenting, but now I feel as though I’ve been invited into the madness. I also think the use of analepsis & prolepsis (flashing back/flashing forward) lend “Midnight’s Children” some cinematic qualities.
Off to read some more now…
LOL… oh Jennii… you went off and read this privately without telling me that you are with us! 😉 I am fairly sure there might be some people in the group who thinks I have invited them into madness in reading this one! Ha ha… I can’t wait to hear what you think at the end! 😀