He (another of Marukami’s story with a name for the protagonist) is a partner of an advertising firm, until one day a man showed up and demand to pay him for withdrawing the sheep ads from publication and gave him a mandate of one month to track down the chest-nut sheep with a star-shaped on its back.
His wife had left him, and he has a girlfriend with exquisite ears. A letter from his friend Rat who decide to go somewhere and had something that he couldn’t express. His wild sheep chase took an extraordinary turn as the chase led him to Sapporo, Hokkaido, where he knew about a right wing politico “The Boss”, The Boss’ religious chauffer, an ovine-obsessed professor who locked up in his room, the history of a village called Junitaki and a manic-depressive in a sheep outfit; in the hunt for a sheep, whose presence may or may not result in the running of the world. Brace yourself for surprises for another of Murakami’s unpredictable story of chasing a sheep.
Warning! Q&A may contain spoiler. If you do not wish to know, you can zoom straight to the end of my post to read what I think about the book.
I am reading this for Tanabata’s JLit Group discussion on 10 March 2010. Here are my responses to some discussion questions from Book Rags:
Throughout the novel, the mystical sheep invades several hosts for various purposes, such as building an empire and transportation to a new host. What or who do you think the sheep represents?
The clue is hidden somewhere between reference to page 10 to 124, the star-shaped sheep represents the Will. The basic mold of the Boss’ will was the star-stained sheep, the will was manifested in the boss. As it is said,
Our organization is can be divided into two elements. The part that moves ahead and the part that drives ahead. The part of the forefront is the Will, the part that backs up the forefront is the Gains. When the boss dies, it will only be his Gains that people will clamour for a share of. Nobody wants the will, because no one understands it. The Will cannot be shared. It is passed on in toto, or lost in toto.
Can you imagine what’s it’s like to be left with a solidarity thought when its embodiment has been pulled out from underneath you?
Initially when I looked at the Red star it sort of hinted at the Red communist star symbol and it is loosely associated with the mention of:
In the beginning, the world was chaos, and chaos is not mediocre. The mediocratisation began when people separated the means of production from daily life. For when Karl Marx posited the proletariat, he thereby cemented their mediocrity. And by the same token, I have high regard for Dostoyevsky. Nonetheless, I do not hold with Marxism. It is far too mediocre.
And it is also mentioned, Chiang-kai Shek’s eventual defeat meant the loss of Chinese Connection from USA and about the Ruso-Japanese war, and perhaps losing the will to go out for a war is maybe not such a bad thing, as in the case of the sheep man. And what about:
When the organization fall apart – a magnificent palace razed to make way for a public housing complex. A world of uniformity and certainty. Fair Allotment and all that. Think about it. The whole of Japan, leveled of mountains, coastlines or lakes, sprawling with uniform rows of public housing. Would that be a right thing? – pg 119 said the boss’ assistant.
Having a star-stained sheep to represent a Will (or a will to fight communism) is a clever analogy. A normal sheep has no will, it is a follower. But to have a sheep which stood out from the crowd represents some sort of revolutionary or rebellious will.
It’s just spurts of light bulb moments but there was no real convincing hypothesis about the Communist star and the sheep. Politically speaking, maybe the sheep is manifested with a will to fight communism. Maybe not.
In Chapter 24, the main character, his girlfriend, and the limo driver discuss the naming of things, places, and creatures. The limo driver believes names depend on physical fixation, free will, and an emotional attachment to humans. Why do you believe we name some areas and things, such as ball parks and boats, but not others?
I thought the discussion on naming was very intriguing. I believe why we gave ball parks and boats name but not airplanes for one simple reason, and that we named something when we feel affectionate towards it. We named our pets, we named out boats because we build and steer it and ball parks because we felt affectionate to the place we spent happy times in. We named an object because we love the object. We don’t named planes because they are built by big corporate and steered by a captain and we are told what to do when we are in the plane, which doesn’t quite promote ownership! 🙂
As the protagonist is an indifferent man, like all heroes in Murakami’s stories, he didn’t feel the need to name his cat. The cat was eventually given the name “Kipper” by the lovable chauffeur who telephoned God every night. 🙂
Not having a name for the character doesn’t bother me. Most of the time I have to try really hard to remember the names of the main characters in some of the stories I read, that they might as well be nameless. I think this nameless style is fine, but most people might find it annoying if they felt they need a name so that they can feel more invested in the main characters.
Do you believe the main character was selfish in his behavior when he accepted his girlfriend’s assistance on the sheep chase? If not, why do you believe he accepted her assistance, knowing she would be in danger?
I don’t think he is selfish. He was clueless as to how to find the sheep and the girlfriend seems to know more than him and sincere in helping him out. I don’t think she is in danger. I think she is part of the scheme to lure the main character to the Rat’s father’s house. Anyone, correct me if I’m wrong.
The Sheep Man is an interesting character; however, the novel does not clearly explain his origin. Who or what do you believe the Sheep Man represents within the novel?
The sheep man represents a weak will. A weak man that wanted so much to be strong (that’s why he wore the sheep costume), but yet is weak to become a better man.
Do you believe the main character changed over the course of the novel? If so, in what ways? If not, why do you believe he is unable to change, even in the face of his experiences?
I am not convinced if the main character changed. I think he just felt really sad for losing his friend. Other than that, as the book title implied “A Wild Goose Chase”.
I actually think A Wild Sheep Chase was far better than A Wind-up Bird Chronicle or Kafka on the Shore. A Wild Sheep Chase is bizarre but the stuff that he mentioned has a logical thread in it. I can’t quite take in Murakami’s later work of its bizarre-ness for the sake of being bizarre. Like Fish falling out from the sky, like doing some thinking down the well, it just didn’t make sense to me. Then again perhaps my thinking is too linear! It’s a minor flaw I am willing to forgive, I still love Murakami’s books. So I’ll be reading all of his books in my lifetime.
In A Wild Sheep Chase, I actually empathise with the main character and the favourite scene was the description of how his girlfriend’s ears make him feel. I also think the characters and their relationships, like those of the main character with his business partner, his friend, and his girlfriend are all believable.
Overall it was a very entertaining read. Although the hiatus in between has more to do with my multiple priorities in life rather than disinterest that made me leave the book for a couple of days. Alfred Birnbaum as usual were superb, as he did the translation on my favourite “Hard-boiled Wonderland and the End of the World”. I am sure the following sentence was Birnbaum’s creation:
Because Japanese language would have been a string of independent words without much space in between anyway. You’ll be amazed how you can read sentences without space! Birnbaum’s translation is flawless and superb. The writing style of Murakami in this book is also clear and succinct. At 299 pages, it was a good read and thanks Tanabata once again to link the members up for a thought provoking discussion. Else I wouldn’t have dwell into the meaning of the elusive sheep!
I’ll leave you with two of my favourite quotes from the book:
I like that word Intercourse. It only poses a limited range of possibilities.
“What is this Will?” I asked.
“A concept that governs time, governs space, and governs possibility.”
“I don’t follow.” I said.
“Of course. Few can. Only the Boss had a virtually instinctual understanding of it. One might even go so far as to say he negated self-cognition, thereupon realizing in its place something entirely revolutionary. To put it in simple terms for you, his was a revolution of labour incorporating capital and capital incorporating labour”. – pg 119, boss’ assistant
My main take away from this book and my sincere wish to all who read it that may you possess the manifesto of the star-stained sheep to achieve great heights in life. I wish I possess it right now! So good luck everyone!
I am reading this for 2010 Global Reading Challenge – Asia and Animal III Challenge (book title with animal name in it).
Paperback. Publisher: Vintage 1982, 2003; Length: 299 pages; Setting: 80’s Japan. Source: Library Loot. Finished reading at: 14 March 2010
So glad you enjoyed this book. (I’ve not read it yet, but I seriously get excited every time someone picks up a Murakami and enjoys the read.) I’ve read Dance Dance Dance though, and I absolutely loved that one.
Wow, a reply from you within 5 minutes of posting the post. It’s midnight for me, gotta hit the sack. thanks for dropping by. Speak soon! Good night.
I haven’t read this one so I didn’t read your Q&As, but I read the end. Kafka on the Shore is my least favorite so far (out of 4 I read), but I loved the Wind-up Bird (though not the last part so much in which the character starts thinking in the well lol). I did think the fish falling from the sky in Kafka was SOOO random, a lot with other random bizarre things going on in the book, which is why it is my least favorite so far.
Yeah I think being random for the sake of random doesn’t work for me. That is why Murakami’s earlier books really works for me, there are logics in each queer incidents, even if it’s a symbolic representation of a concept. But some weirdness of his latter work doesn’t appeal so much to me.
Having said that, I’m still a big fan of Murakami. So it’s a minor flaw I’m happy to overlook.
Loved reading your post. You put a lot of thought into it. I agree with your take on the Sheep Man and what he represents. I think you hit that one on the nail. Really liked all your other answers, but the Sheep Man struck me the most – it was a “duh” “oh yeah” moment for me…so straight forth yet did not come to me so clearly until I read your answer.
While I really liked A Wild Sheep Chase, I think I am liking Wind-Up Bird more. Although, I have only finished book one of wind-up bird so I shall see if this opinion changes once I am done.
Thanks for dropping by. That’s my interpretation anyway. Reading a book like Murakami’s is like wearing the hat of a scientist or a theorist, once you get an idea in your head, you kept reading it and testing it, and look for clues to support your original idea. I’m sure someone would come up with something totally different from me!
I think Wind-up Bird is best taken in bite size. It was suppose to be 4 books, instead I read all of them in one book, so it does get a little weary for me.
I had not thought of the sheep representing the Will before, but what you said makes sense. This is such a thought provoking book, with such disturbing conclusion; it really broke my heart that Rat died. Your thoughts on it were very insightful, which is wonderful when reading/discussing Murakami as he’s so multi-faceted.
Thanks for the kind words Bellezza. This is my first time joining Tanabata’s readalong, as I paid attention, I picked up clues along the way. Otherwise I think I would have read through without any good insights at all!
Rat’s death disturbed you I think it is because you have read “Trilogy of the Rat” and feel vested in the Rat. This is the first time I heard about the Rat… so I was like “Oh, he died.”, feeling rather indifferent. But I will read Murakami’s earlier books.. or rather ALL his books, so maybe I’ll get to know the Rat! Mukarami is indeed multi-faceted, sometimes I think he is insane. 🙂
Hi! I just finished reading this book and found this page, which has been very helpful. There’s only one question I’m still wondering about – why did the Rat send the picture to the narrator with the request to publish it? By the end it became clear that the Boss Secretary knew all along about the house was all along and that the narrator was a pawn to the Boss Secretary to lure the Rat out of his lair. However, as the story progressed it also became clear that the Rat knew the narrator was looking for him. Did the Rat send the picture with a certain purpose to set things in motion, to get the narrator to find him? So he could lure the Boss secretary to the house at the right time after setting off the bomb?
Look forward to hear your thoughts on it!